If you have a Beneficiary IRA the chances are very high that your CPA, advisor and/or custodian are setting you up for IRS trouble. That’s because most of these people do not know how to calculate your Required Minimum Distribution. I published this post on Beneficiary IRA Distributions about a month ago. Since then, I’ve uncovered 3 custodian mistakes (a company that handles hundreds of billions of IRA money).
No less frightening, I had to explain how the Beneficiary IRA RMD is calculated to no less 4 CPAs that work with my clients. Take a few minutes. Read through this post and confirm your own RMD. It’s simple and shouldn’t take more than 20 minutes tops. If you have questions – connect with me.. This is too damn important to gloss over. I want to do whatever I can to make sure good Pilgrims stay out of trouble.
When You Must Start To Take Distributions
If you inherit an IRA, you must take distributions. It doesn’t matter how old you are. And sadly, it doesn’t even matter if you need or want the money. The IRS boys want you to take your distributions starting the year after you inherit the account. (Read “IRA Beneficiary Rules“.)
The Calculation
Please don’t leave the calculation of your beneficiary IRA RMD (required minimum distribution) up to your custodian. They make too many mistakes. You must confirm the calculation yourself or ask your tax professional to do so.
Fortunately, it’s not that tough to do this yourself. Here’s your formula to make the calculations:
1. Take the year the beneficiary was born and subtract it from the year the decedent died. Then add one. This is the age of the beneficiary in the first year she must take a distribution. This will be important later.
2. Look up IRS Publication 590 table 1. There is a factor that corresponds to the “age” you calculated in the first step.
3. Divide the account balance at the end of the year by the factor. This is the amount you must withdraw.
4. Take the distribution.
5. For each subsequent year, take the factor from the previous year and subtract “1”. Divide the year end balance this year by this new factor. Take distributions.
EXAMPLE 1
Let’s say I was born in 1957 and I inherited money from Joe who died in 2011. I take 2011 an subtract 1957 and add 1. The result is 55.
2011-1957+1=55. So, I’ll be 55 in 2012 and that’s the year I must take my first distribution. So far, so good.
Now I go to the IRS publication 590 and scroll down to the bottom to find table 1. There I see my factor which is 29.6. I’ll use that factor in 2012. So if the balance in my inherited IRA is $100,000 on 12/31/11, I divide $100,000 by 29.6 to determine my RMD in 2012. That’s the amount of money I must withdraw in 2012 in order to satisfy my RMD.
In 2013, I’ll use 28.6 as a factor. In 2014 I’ll use 27.6 etc
EXAMPLE 2
Again, I was born in 1957. I inherited money from Joe who died in 2000. Let’s do the calculations using the formula above. I’ll take 2000 and add 1 and then subtract 1957 to arrive at 44. That was my age in 2001 and it’s important because that’s the year I had to start taking my RMD.
Then I’ll look up my factor and get 39.8. That’s the factor I should have used in 2001. But in 2011 it’s 10 years later. So my factor is 29.8. If the balance on my account on 12/31/2010 was $100,0000, I’ll divide $100,000 by 29.8 and take a distribution of $3356. Simple as pie.
If you think this is complicated, please give it a try anyway. You’ll see that it’s simple. Many banks and IRA custodians get this wrong and I don’t want you to get in hot water because of their mistake. Always consult with your tax professional but feel confident that you can do this as well. You will feel so great prancing in to your CPA’s office telling her that you confirmed that what she did was right (or discovered an error). It’s pretty empowering.
Do you have an inherited IRA? Were you involved in calculating the RMD? Have you ever had a problem because somebody miscalculated the number? I’d love to hear from you. Leave a comment!
User Generated Content (UGC) Disclosure: Please note that the opinions of the commenters are not necessarily the opinions of this site.