If you and your spouse argue about money, learn how to sit down and talk about money together. If that doesn’t work, consider having separate finances. It might be the best way to keep your relationship intact.
Normally, I recommend that couples keep their finances together. It’s easier to track spending and savings. It’s also easier to work together to plot a course for the future. But sometimes this is terrible advice. My experience tells me that one in 10 couples should keep their finances separate.
You’ll know if you are that one in 10 if you and your spouse fight about money and/or just don’t seem to make any headway toward your ultimate financial goals. Believe it or not, keeping the money separate can sometimes do wonders to help you increase savings, maintain a high credit score, track your budget and advance toward your financial dreams. It can also significantly reduce the conflict at home.
The trick to separating finances is to set up strict monthly goals without micromanaging your partner’s spending. The reason I focus on spending is because it’s typically budgeting and spending tracking that causes couples to fight. They argue over what’s necessary and what isn’t.
By separating your money, you don’t have to worry about that anymore. Even if you make most of the money and your husband does most of the spending, you can still find a way to split the finances rather than the marriage.
1. Allowances
Each of you gets an allowance. But you also get an area of responsibility. Let’s say you bring home $7,000 a month and your husband brings home $2,000. That’s a total of $9,000. Let’s say he’s responsible to pay the mortgage and to buy food. You are responsible (in this example) for everything else – including saving for the future.
Let’s assume that it will cost $3,000 a month to cover his responsibilities and it will cost you $3,000 to cover yours. You have $3,000 extra.
You might decide, as a couple, to bump up the savings another $2,000 each month and split the spare $1,000. So each of you would get an additional $500 a month for extras. You each make your own decisions about that money. You can either save it for unexpected emergencies or future goodies. On the other hand, you can spend that money too. It’s up to each of you. The rule is nobody is allowed to scrutinize what the other decides to do with that extra $500 a month.
(On the other hand, if one spouse wants more money than is budgeted, he can always look for a second job.)
2. Accountability
This works great if everyone sticks to the agreement. But how do you make sure your husband is actually paying the bills? This may seem like a dumb question but I ran into a case last year where a couple encountered this exact issue. He was in charge of paying the bills but didn’t do it.
He thought it would be better to play the ponies instead. By the time my friend found out about her husband’s irresponsibility, they were facing bankruptcy and foreclosure. She was angry and started talking about divorce, and I couldn’t really blame her. But thankfully, this couple worked it out by separating their finances, making allowances and (most important) having accountability.
In their case, the wife took over paying the bills, and she showed her husband the receipts each month.
In my opinion, if you’re going to separate your finances and assign different areas of responsibility, it makes sense that each partner show the other that they have fulfilled their responsibilities each month. Set up a time and stick to it. Have your monthly meeting and be accountable to each other.
3. Be Flexible
Over time, your needs, goals and financial resources will change. You have to make allowances for these changes too. The problem of course is that some people use this as an excuse. They point to some “special circumstance” and try to leverage that into the reason they spent too much or otherwise didn’t live up to their responsibilities. In my opinion, the only way around this issue is to have a third-party accountability judge. This person is going to have the hard job of deciding just how “special” the “special circumstance” is. Does the situation require or justify a new spending pattern, or not?
If you are a couple which has decided to split the finances, chances are high that you won’t be able to make this determination yourselves. If you can’t find a friend who is willing to be your accountability judge, hire a financial advisor for an hour and get his opinion as these items come up. You likely won’t have to see the advisor more than once or twice a year and, believe me, it’s going to be a lot cheaper than a divorce.
Related Posts:
Cold hard facts about money and marriage.
How to stop arguing about money.
Outside Resources:
US News Accountability: His and Hers
Victoria Jeffreys says
My husband and I have struggled with how to manage our finances in a blended household. I have a high $ cash contribution and he has high $ value contribution to our now jointly assets as well as a significant monthly gifted cash income from his parents wealth. My teenage daughters live with us full time and her son roughly half – 3/4 time. My income covers our mortgage and all day to day living expenses and his income all goes toward savings. My husband is generous in using his gift income to buy extra household items, furniture and trips that benefit everyone.
While well intended, we each feel uncomfortable with whether the contribution of the other is fully recognized and seem to struggle with what is “fair” to expend on my daughters from my/our income while not setting limits on what he spends from his gifted income on his son. I feel constrained and micro managed that all my income is considered “ours” and I have no discretion to spend independently when we clearly have more than we truly need. He feels that he unfairly subsidizes my discretionary spending and feels that he cannot fully trust me if I am not 100% transparent in how I spend my income. While we are able to be independent, I often resent the issues raised by his gifted income. I’m sure many would love to have this problem, but I wouldn’t wish it on anyone as it makes for a challenge in our marriage.
Is separating our finances the answer and how might we approach this given our different kinds of financial contributions?
Neal Frankle, CFP ® says
This is a very good question – and very unique to the people involved. And the stakes are high as you stated. I’ve seen this with other clients.
I think you have to work out the ground rules – and write them down. Separating the finances might help – but I don’t think it will solve the problem based on what I see in your question. Have you spoken to an objective independent advisor who can act as a moderator?
Candy says
We are newlyweds over 60. My husband pays all the bills and I only pay what I came with and I support the home I own. We live in his house. I know his incomebecausd he was a public employee but he hides his checkbook and all banking information. He refuses to share it with me, yet States I am the benefiary on all if ur.
I know he pays the bills… the mail makes all that obvious.
But should he share with me the balances and the banking information?
We fight about it regularly because I feel I trusted.
Neal Frankle, CFP ® says
This is a tough one. I would actually seek out a marriage counselor to discuss. I don’t think you can force him to do anything and he can’t force you to be OK with this so a third-party might be useful.
Neal
Amy New says
Thank you for the article. I am glad most people think a woman can contribute to the family so much.
Robert @ The College Investor says
My wife and I put everything into one pot, pay the bills, and trust each other not to spend. We have one card that we use, and we have everything in Quicken, so we can always see what was spent.
I keep with trust!
Wiseguy says
True, this depends on the people. If you agree with paying “equally” based on ability to pay, this works perfectly. But if you believe that “equal” means 50/50, this isn’t going to work.
The problem I have with a 50/50 split is that a large difference in income could cause one spouse to never make money, or even lose money. Taking the example from my last post, a 50/50 split of $5000 in expenses would be $2500/person, leaving the husband $500 short of paying his share after contributing every cent he makes. He just can’t do it.
I assume the wife wouldn’t force him to go into debt for this (haha), so she only requires him to pay as much as he can and covers the difference herself. He still will never have any savings. Ever. If she shares her savings with him jointly, what’s the point of having separate finances?
If this is the case, perhaps a way to make it as “fair” as possible would be to let him save a set amount each month (say, $200) then pay the rest. That way he would still pay as much as he could toward his 50% share but also retain some savings.
Neal@Wealth Pilgrim says
I like it. Again…..I think it depends on the couple. Interesting idea….
Wiseguy says
What about equal share proportional to earning amount? Rather than splitting the list of responsibilities between people, share all responsibilities in a “pot” of sorts and contribute in proportion to your individual income. That way all responsibility is shared, yet you keep your individual finances separate.
Rather than approximating with “you pay these bills, and I’ll pay those,” you can guarantee that it’s perfectly even.
Let’s say the wife makes $6000/mo and the husband makes $2000/mo, totaling $8000/mo. She makes 75% (6/8) of the household income, while he makes 25% (2/8). Therefore, she should pay 75% of the monthly expenses and he should pay 25% of the expenses.
Now, let’s say that all monthly bills add up to $5000. She would pay 75% of $5000 (=$3750), and he would pay 25% of $5000 (=$1250). Here’s how we know that’s fair:
$3750 paid / $6000 income = 63% of her income
$1250 paid / $2000 income = 63% of his income
You might also want to have joint savings, in which case you would just add total savings (say, $1000) to the “pot” before you split it ($750 from her, $250 from him).
Sorry if you don’t like numbers, but this really is pretty easy.
—
Disclaimer: I am not yet married, so don’t take this to be the voice of experience. It’s just a thought.
Briana @ GBR says
This is something that’s working for me and my fiancee. We’re keeping each other accountable, making sure we ask questions. “Did you pay for this?” since we both have our own things to pay for. Our allowance is essentially what’s left of our paycheck after household expenses
Neal@Wealth Pilgrim says
Sounds like you have it worked out well. I believe that most any plan can work as long as you stick to it. Nicely done!
LifeAndMyFinances says
Interesting plan. It sounds a bit complex though. My wife and I combine all of our earnings and from the total we allow ourselves $100 each in “play money”. Everything else goes toward the bills and debt.