<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is Tax Deferral?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wealthpilgrim.com/what-is-tax-deferral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/what-is-tax-deferral/</link>
	<description>WealthPilgrim.com -No Money Worries. No Matter What.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Frankle</title>
		<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/what-is-tax-deferral/#comment-38323</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Frankle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wealthpilgrim.com/?p=20030#comment-38323</guid>
		<description>Mike.  You are right!  Thanks.  I made the correction!

Neal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike.  You are right!  Thanks.  I made the correction!</p>
<p>Neal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/what-is-tax-deferral/#comment-38322</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wealthpilgrim.com/?p=20030#comment-38322</guid>
		<description>Hi, Neal. Are some of the numbers in your table reversed? From the above example, I thought the value of the tax-deferred $100,000 investment would be $324,000 and the net income would be $9,081 after 30 years. However, on the table these numbers are reversed with the non-deferred account.

It was just a little confusing because the table was going against everything you said in the paragraph that preceded it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Neal. Are some of the numbers in your table reversed? From the above example, I thought the value of the tax-deferred $100,000 investment would be $324,000 and the net income would be $9,081 after 30 years. However, on the table these numbers are reversed with the non-deferred account.</p>
<p>It was just a little confusing because the table was going against everything you said in the paragraph that preceded it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Frankle</title>
		<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/what-is-tax-deferral/#comment-30499</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Frankle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wealthpilgrim.com/?p=20030#comment-30499</guid>
		<description>I believe it is generally agreed that the Roth option is good for younger investors - if you believe the government won&#039;t change the rules.  A big if.

Also, w/regards to conversion, there are some cases where this makes sense. It certainly doesn&#039;t if the taxpayer is paying those taxes from the retirement account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it is generally agreed that the Roth option is good for younger investors &#8211; if you believe the government won&#8217;t change the rules.  A big if.</p>
<p>Also, w/regards to conversion, there are some cases where this makes sense. It certainly doesn&#8217;t if the taxpayer is paying those taxes from the retirement account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Optimus Thomas</title>
		<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/what-is-tax-deferral/#comment-30494</link>
		<dc:creator>Optimus Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wealthpilgrim.com/?p=20030#comment-30494</guid>
		<description>I agree it was a great article. I also agree that Traditional IRA’s and 401K accounts are great examples of tax deferred accounts.

The balance of these account grow tax deferred which means that the tax payment is due upon withdrawal which is usually at retirement.

There is a lot of debate as to which accounts are ultimately better- a Traditional IRA, a tax deferred account or a Roth IRA or taxable accounts that allows tax –free withdrawals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree it was a great article. I also agree that Traditional IRA’s and 401K accounts are great examples of tax deferred accounts.</p>
<p>The balance of these account grow tax deferred which means that the tax payment is due upon withdrawal which is usually at retirement.</p>
<p>There is a lot of debate as to which accounts are ultimately better- a Traditional IRA, a tax deferred account or a Roth IRA or taxable accounts that allows tax –free withdrawals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Frankle</title>
		<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/what-is-tax-deferral/#comment-24892</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Frankle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wealthpilgrim.com/?p=20030#comment-24892</guid>
		<description>Well...for very young people maxing out the Roth can be a good idea.  This is especially so if tax rates rise (and stay up there) into retirement.  Of course, nobody knows what rates are going to be.  Again, the younger you are, the better this works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;for very young people maxing out the Roth can be a good idea.  This is especially so if tax rates rise (and stay up there) into retirement.  Of course, nobody knows what rates are going to be.  Again, the younger you are, the better this works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.655 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-22 19:35:53 -->

