<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 30 vs. 15-Year Mortgage. Which Is Best for First-Time Homebuyers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wealthpilgrim.com/30-vs-15-year-mortgage-which-is-best-for-first-time-homebuyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/30-vs-15-year-mortgage-which-is-best-for-first-time-homebuyers/</link>
	<description>WealthPilgrim.com -No Money Worries. No Matter What.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 03:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ranch111</title>
		<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/30-vs-15-year-mortgage-which-is-best-for-first-time-homebuyers/#comment-7183</link>
		<dc:creator>ranch111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wealthpilgrim.com/?p=15176#comment-7183</guid>
		<description>We are refinancing a 6.25% 30-year FHA loan to a 3.75% 15-year conventional. Getting rid of the PMI. Taking control of the ripoff escrow. Our P&amp;I went up about $65. I think we can handle it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are refinancing a 6.25% 30-year FHA loan to a 3.75% 15-year conventional. Getting rid of the PMI. Taking control of the ripoff escrow. Our P&amp;I went up about $65. I think we can handle it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara A.</title>
		<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/30-vs-15-year-mortgage-which-is-best-for-first-time-homebuyers/#comment-5789</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wealthpilgrim.com/?p=15176#comment-5789</guid>
		<description>If you can&#039;t afford a 15 year mortgage, you can&#039;t afford the home!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can&#8217;t afford a 15 year mortgage, you can&#8217;t afford the home!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belmont Thornton</title>
		<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/30-vs-15-year-mortgage-which-is-best-for-first-time-homebuyers/#comment-5709</link>
		<dc:creator>Belmont Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wealthpilgrim.com/?p=15176#comment-5709</guid>
		<description>I feel the sooner you are out of debt the better. If the repayment period is short then the amount is high, but if you see the better side of it, you are getting out of the debt sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel the sooner you are out of debt the better. If the repayment period is short then the amount is high, but if you see the better side of it, you are getting out of the debt sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Bondage</title>
		<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/30-vs-15-year-mortgage-which-is-best-for-first-time-homebuyers/#comment-5670</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Bondage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wealthpilgrim.com/?p=15176#comment-5670</guid>
		<description>15 year loan saves money. I would get no longer than a 20 year loan. 

shorter loan means your payment is higher but you save money in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>15 year loan saves money. I would get no longer than a 20 year loan. </p>
<p>shorter loan means your payment is higher but you save money in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Warshauer</title>
		<link>http://wealthpilgrim.com/30-vs-15-year-mortgage-which-is-best-for-first-time-homebuyers/#comment-5654</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Warshauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wealthpilgrim.com/?p=15176#comment-5654</guid>
		<description>@JoeTaxpayer,

I think that&#039;s a great point.  If you can be satisfied with the smaller home, you are still better off with the 30 year mortgage.  Your $163,000 mortgage mortgage would have payments of about $875/month instead of $1,250/month, leaving you an extra $375/month to save or spend as you see fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JoeTaxpayer,</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s a great point.  If you can be satisfied with the smaller home, you are still better off with the 30 year mortgage.  Your $163,000 mortgage mortgage would have payments of about $875/month instead of $1,250/month, leaving you an extra $375/month to save or spend as you see fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

